DevOps

    Kubernetes Services

    When Kubernetes is genuinely the right answer, the difference between a cluster that runs itself and one that eats an engineer every week is in the setup: node strategy, upgrade path, resource governance and what happens when a node disappears.

    Start with the audit

    No sales layer, no juniors. You meet the engineer before anything begins.

    // What is included

    What you get

    • Cluster and node group design sized to your actual workloads
    • An upgrade path that does not require a maintenance weekend
    • Ingress, DNS and certificates that renew without anybody remembering
    • Cost controls: right-sized nodes, spot where it is safe, idle capacity reclaimed

    // How it runs

    The sequence

    1. 01

      Design

      Node strategy, networking and namespaces argued against your workloads.

    2. 02

      Build

      Cluster and platform add-ons defined in code, not clicked together.

    3. 03

      Operate

      Upgrades, capacity and security posture handled on a cadence.

    // Stack

    • Kubernetes
    • Amazon EKS
    • Helm
    • Karpenter
    • Terraform
    • Prometheus

    // Related work

    Where this has been done before

    Client names under NDA. The numbers are not.

    Self-hosted infrastructure retired onto managed services (NDA)

    • Self-managed Kubernetes to ECS and Fargate
    • Configuration store to Parameter Store and Secrets Manager
    • Artifact repository to ECR and CodeArtifact

    Four self-maintained components retired

    All case studies

    // Questions

    Before you ask

    Talk to the engineer who would do the work

    A 20 minute call. You describe your setup, you get an honest read on whether this helps, and the top risks worth looking at first.

    See pricing